For about ten years now (it dates back to the previous mayor), the city has picked up green waste from the back of people's homes. The principle of green waste pick-up is sound, as it reduces the amount of recyclable material going to the landfill, but the way we do it has always seemed inefficient to me. Waste is either in clear plastic bags or, in the case of branches, bundled. It's picked up by three guys in a 5 ton rear-loading garbage truck. While residents are asked to put it out on the same day as their recycling day, it may or may not get picked up that day. And for those who still have large communal bins, they have no scheduled pick-up day. Often, to make up for being badly behind schedule, pick up is done on the weekend, with overtime being paid to the three guys on the truck. When the program started, there was another individual out at the landfill, whose job was to slit and empty the bags of waste; now the bags are slit and emptied at pick up, but I'm not sure how or where the plastic is disposed of. And, of course, not everyone uses the program - people still put green waste in with their garbage, because it's easier.
When this would come up as part of the sanitation budget every year, I would ask for the cost, and suggest that this could be a service that we could cut to reduce costs. The answer was always that it cost $100,000 a year, but we were never given details. Another block to even considering change is that some members of council are reluctant to reduce services, even those that are only used by a minority of residents.
Then a few years back, I found out that Saskatoon offers a green waste recycling program, Green Cart, that is a subscription service. It uses the same automated trucks that we use for the roll-out garbage and recycling bins (which have one operator rather than three), and picks up both yard and food waste in green bins. Waste does not have to be bagged, which saves residents the cost of bags, and the city the costs of removing the bags or unbundling the branches. The program operates from early May until early November, and costs interested residents $55 per year. For those not interested, there's no cost. To me it seems like a good solution - subscribers pay less than $10 a month, and the program runs more efficiently because the trucks know exactly where to go. That's got to save time and money over three guys in a truck going down every alley and street, looking for bags and bundles that may or may not be there.
A further impending cost of the current program is the need to upgrade the composting building at the landfill. This is where the waste is taken and mixed with sludge, with the resulting mixture used as overlay for the landfill. The equipment within this building, fans and such, is reaching the end of its lifespan, and it will be helpful to find out if there are cheaper alternatives.
Fortunately, I finally got unanimous support from my colleagues at last week's Executive Committee meeting. We have directed administration to prepare a report on the costs of the current program, and the costs of changing to something like the Green Cart program. And we've asked for this report to be presented to us by the end of September, as so often reports are requested without a target date, which means that it can be months or years before a report is presented. So we haven't decided to make a change; we've decided to get the information needed before deciding whether to make a change.
I'm looking forward to seeing this report, which hopefully will contain better information than we've been given so far. I find it hard to believe that the costs of our current program have held steady at $100,000 per year for the last several years - it would be the only city program I'm aware of where costs haven't increased over the years. Once council has the report, we'll be able to make a decision made on facts and information, not on emotion. If we do move to a subscriber program, that means the costs will be borne by the users, not by all residents, and I would hope that the savings would be reflected in the sanitation budget. That would bring some fairness into a system that too often makes everyone subsidize programs utilized by a few.
"In the absence of information, we jump to the worst conclusions." - Myra Kassim