One of the mass generalizations that is often made is that council needs more business people. As with most generalizations, it isn't true. In fact, during a conversation over coffee with my invaluable media consultant, her opinion was that the way a business operates is different from how a government operates, and that what is needed is either more people with government experience, or more people who understand that the rules for each are different, and when on council, one should operate by the appropriate set of rules.
One of the differences is that people who are used to how businesses run is that they're used to making decisions on their own, not as part of a group. This isn't how council operates - most decisions are supposed to be made by council as a whole, not by one individual. And there is no place for backroom deals on council; every decision should be transparent.
That's because council is responsible for its decisions to city residents, not to shareholders of a business. Plus there is legislation that is supposed to be followed - that can be difficult when most members of council don't bother to familiarize themselves with the Cities Act, but that should be part of the learning process.
There's also a tendency of some of these individuals to hog the credit - to not inform all members of council about public events, for example, so that they can be the only one there for the photo op, or to talk about how they alone have solved problems. This doesn't make for good team dynamics, to say the least.
I'm not saying that business people shouldn't be on council - they bring a valuable perspective that comes only with experience in having to cover expenses through revenues, one that those who think that just raising taxes is okay don't have. (I'm thinking of administration, most of whom have spent their entire careers in government.) So raising concerns about efficiency and economy is something that should be valued and encouraged during council discussions.
My personal opinion is that it isn't the previous (or current) profession that matters for council members; it's more to do with their basic character. I would much rather work as a member of council with people who are willing to work hard, speak up, do the research, and behave with integrity. For instance, someone who has made questionable financial decisions, such as not paying their taxes, then fighting the city in court over the result of that decision, should probably not be allowed to vote on new tax rates - to me it's coming perilously close to conflict of interest, and they should, at the very least, remove themselves from the discussion and the vote.
I think that's what most people expect from council members - that they follow the rules and act in the best interests of the city as a whole. After all, members of council are supposed to set a good example, not be a horrible warning.
"To give real service you must add something which cannot be bought or measured with money, and that is sincerity and integrity." - Douglas Adams